Comparing the price of an asset to similar ones is an intuitive pricing method used across various markets—from real estate to vehicles and electronics. For example, when buying a car, you would visit multiple dealerships, assess different vehicle features, and compare their prices.

It’s crucial to compare like with like; you wouldn’t match the price of a luxury car with that of an economy model. But you’d expect similar pricing among premium brands like Mercedes, BMW, and Audi. For instance, a Mercedes C-class starts at about $44,600, an Audi A4 at $40,995, and a BMW 3-series at $42,455—each price reflecting the market average for comparable assets.

Valuation multiples is also effective in company valuation, where firms are assessed based on business type, industry, size, location, and growth prospects to determine market value.

Practical Application of Multiples

What exactly is a multiple, and how do we use them? Consider Joan, who is shopping for a new house. She falls in love with a property shown by her real estate broker, but doubts about the price arise post-excitement. To determine if the price is fair, Joan investigates and discovers the adjacent house sold for $150,000 with an area of 1,500 sq. ft.—equating to $100 per square foot.

In real estate, this rate—called ‘price per square foot’—allows meaningful price comparisons for similar properties. It functions much like revenue multiples used in business valuations, where companies are valued at a multiple of their revenues. Similarly, ‘price per square foot’ provides a standardized measure to compare and assess the value of different properties based on their area.

Joan’s desired house (larger at 2,000 sq. ft.) is priced at $200,000—also $100 per square foot. This price per square foot, matching the neighbor’s, confirms to Joan that her potential investment is reasonably priced. This ratio—calculated by dividing the property price by its square footage—is termed a multiple in company valuation contexts.

Harnessing the Power of Multiples in Financial Valuation

Investment bankers and investors favor multiples for their simplicity and speed in estimating rough values. For instance, if an industry expert knows firms typically trade at 11 times earnings, applying this multiple to a company with $100 million in net income suggests a $1.1 billion market value almost instantaneously.

But seasoned investors approach multiple analyses cautiously, embedding significant detail and deliberation for a comprehensive evaluation. While multiples should not be used in isolation, they effectively corroborate discounted cash flow (DCF) analyses, secondary validating these findings. Additionally, multiples reflect market sentiment—a critical element in asset valuation under the assumption of market efficiency.

Insights into Valuation Multiples: Earnings, Sales, and Industry-Specific Metrics

The three most popular valuation multiples are based on earnings, sales, and industry indicators, each with a distinct hierarchy.

Earnings Multiples

Earnings multiples—favored by analysts for comparing firms based on cash flow generation (a key investor focus)—typically involve the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and EV/EBITDA, which vary considerably.

Sales Multiples

Earnings multiples, however, aren’t always applicable, such as when a company is unprofitable or has volatile financial results. Sales multiples become the next best metric for assessing value in these cases. Despite their simplicity, sales multiples overlook profitability—potentially equating less efficient but equally sized firms. Price-to-sales (P/S) and enterprise value-to-sales (EV/sales) are the most frequent sales multiples.  

Industry Indicators

If a company lacks sales, industry-specific revenue multiples are the last resort. During the dot-com bubble, many mergers and acquisitions relied on non-financial metrics like website users to gauge company value, which is highly speculative and uncertain. Another industry-specific example is the EV/units of production in the oil & gas sector, where output measures relative value.

Trading and Transaction Multiples

When discussing valuation multiples, it’s crucial to differentiate between trading and transaction multiples. Trading multiples—like the well-known price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio—are based on the current market prices of publicly traded companies. For example, if Meta’s market cap is $1 trillion and its net profit is $100 billion, its PE ratio is 10. These multiples are easily updated and reflect the market’s latest perspective, which is essential in dynamic environments.

Conversely, transaction multiples derive from historical acquisition prices. They use the purchase prices from similar firms’ M&A deals to determine valuations, often including a control premium because they typically exceed trading multiples. For instance, a typical transaction multiple is the acquisition price divided by EBITDA. While insightful—especially for firms planning acquisitions—these multiples can be outdated due to infrequent comparable transactions and rapidly changing market conditions.

Ideally, both multiples are used together—trading multiples for current valuations and transaction multiples for understanding potential acquisition premiums.

Valuation Simplicity and Risks

We noted that multiples valuation seems quick and straightforward, and indeed it can be; one can compute price earnings rapidly. Yet, the trade-off for swift estimations is accuracy. A sophisticated investor who devotes more time to a multiples valuation will capture more nuances in their analysis, bringing them closer to the actual asset value. Keep several principles in mind when employing valuation multiples.

Principles in Multiples Valuation

Principle One: Valuing Conglomerate Earnings

Conglomerate companies are assessed as the sum of their parts since not all earnings and revenue multiples are equivalent. This may initially seem illogical, but there’s a rational explanation.

Several years ago, Adobe shifted to a subscription model—a wise move because it potentially increases customer lifetime value by offering bundled products as recurring subscriptions. Due to their predictability and frequency, these are generally more valuable than one-off sales. Despite this, Adobe still offers products via traditional one-time sales.

In this context, earnings from subscriptions and one-time sales are unequal and should be valued differently. For instance, one might value one-off sales at two to four times revenue, whereas subscription revenue could command multiples of eight to ten or higher.

Consider Tesla, which operates distinct business units with differing economic characteristics. The automotive sector might warrant higher multiples due to its competitive advantages and market position, while the solar industry—facing stiff competition and less brand loyalty—might attract lower multiples.

Principle Two: P/E Ratios – Understanding Capital Structure Influence

The second principle concerns the use of the P/E ratio. This multiple is quickly calculated and widely discussed, yet a company’s capital structure influences it. Highly leveraged companies with lower earnings might show deceptively high P/E ratios despite similar cash flows to their peers. While P/E offers a quick snapshot of market valuation—for detailed analyses—it’s better to use a multiple unaffected by capital structure.  

Principle Three: Adjusting for Clarity

The third principle emphasizes adjusting non-operating revenue, expenses, assets, and liabilities. Non-operating items are those not intrinsic to a company’s primary business activities. For example, if EBITDA calculations include non-operational or one-off items, it’s crucial to exclude these from the analysis along with any non-operating assets and liabilities.

Principle Four: Peer Selection

The critical role of peer group selection in valuation multiples is complex and nuanced. Valuing Tesla using multiples from companies like Fiat, Ford, and Renault could inaccurately align its worth with these firms. Instead, choosing comparables with similar growth prospects, financial performance, products, target markets, and strategic positioning is essential. Thorough research and careful analysis are imperative for evaluating these factors, underscoring why detailed multiples valuation is as time-intensive as DCF modeling. Properly selecting comparable companies directly influences the quality of your valuation work.

Each principle adds complexity to multiples valuation—highlighting a trade-off between theoretical accuracy and the time required for analysis. Striking the right balance involves a judgment call based on the specific situation. Moving forward—even if you overlook some principles—you’ll be conscious of making rough estimates that will need closer scrutiny when time allows.

Grasping Price/Earnings and EV/EBITDA

Price-to-earnings is the most popular valuation multiple: simple to calculate and commonly included in financial summaries when researching stocks. In contrast, EV/EBITDA (or variations like EBIT or EBITA) is more complex and open to analyst interpretation but avoids distortion by capital structure. This highlights the importance of choosing the correct valuation multiples depending on the specific analysis and company characteristics.  

To demonstrate, consider two similar companies, A and B, in the same industry with identical growth prospects. Both have a P&L and balance sheet, allowing us to calculate their P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples. Reviewing their profit and loss, both companies post equal business volumes (annual revenue of $1,000) but differ significantly in net income; A makes $40, while B makes $120.

This discrepancy isn’t due to operational efficiency—both have equal Gross Profit and EBITDA. The difference lies in their interest expenses, influenced by their debt levels; A’s debt is three times B’s ($3,000 vs $1,000)—resulting in higher interest costs and lower net income. Their balance sheets are similar, with equal current and long-term assets and short-term liabilities. The key variance is their financing leverage.

Evaluating Stock Affordability Using P/E Ratios

Let’s calculate the P/E ratio using data from the P&L and balance sheet—equity and net income. Assuming equity equals the firm’s market cap, P/E is calculated by dividing equity by net income. Company A’s P/E multiple is 12.5, while Company B’s is 20.8—indicating that Company A’s shares are more affordable at only 12.5 times annual earnings, compared to 20.8 for Company B.

Understanding EV/EBITDA: A Practical Calculation

We aim to calculate the EV/EBITDA multiple. We already have EBITDA, but EV isn’t directly derived from the P&L and Balance Sheet; it must be computed. EV equals the market value of equity plus market debt and similar obligations minus cash and non-operating assets that don’t affect EBITDA.

For simplicity, we’ll assume the only debt is ‘Debt’ from the balance sheet, equity represents market value, and both firms lack cash or non-operating assets. Therefore, by adding debt and equity, Company A and Company B achieve an EV of $3,500. With identical EBITDA, their EV/EBITDA multiples are also equal—showing that this metric remains unaffected by capital structure variations, unlike price/earnings, which influence financing decisions.

When valuing a firm using valuation multiples, understanding EV is crucial as capital structures can quickly change, highlighting long-term operational cash flow generation over capital invested.

Navigating the Complexities of Financial Multiples

Using multiples valuation is not always faster than constructing a complete DCF model. Achieving precision with multiples can be time-consuming and complex. There’s a distinct trade-off between accuracy and time investment.

1. Quick P/E Calculation: Utilize straightforward P/E multiples for rapid benchmarking, with caution needed due to capital structure distortions. The advantage of PE multiples is their availability as a quick market comparison tool.

2. Detailed EV/EBITDA Usage: Employ more detailed multiples like EV/EBITDA for less urgent valuations, requiring financial statement review. Without adjustments for non-recurring or non-operational items, this method is more detailed than P/E but remains relatively straightforward.

3. In-depth Multiples Analysis: Conduct a sophisticated, time-intensive multiples valuation with detailed adjustments for accurate enterprise assessments. This includes examining financial statement notes to adjust EBITDA and enterprise value for non-operating items and isolating one-offs.

For instance, if rental income is excluded from EBITDA, corresponding real estate assets must be subtracted from enterprise value calculations. Even with sufficient time, the level of detail achievable is often constrained by the quality of financial disclosures. Therefore, valuations should aim for the highest accuracy possible within these limits.

Valuation Multiples: Balancing Speed and Precision in Financial Estimation

Valuation multiples are essential for quickly estimating asset values, as demonstrated by various examples from everyday transactions to corporate finance. While P/E and EV/EBITDA offer simplicity, they require careful application to ensure accuracy. Multiples should complement other valuation techniques—balancing quick assessments with the demand for detailed analysis. This approach underscores the blend of art and science inherent in financial valuation.

Gain expertise in valuation multiples with 365 Financial Analyst’s comprehensive courses designed for foundational learning and skill enhancement. Subscribe to our platform and start advancing your knowledge today.

FREE SIGN UP